README formatting
This commit is contained in:
@@ -237,11 +237,8 @@ Run the built-in benchmark to see which variant is fastest on your machine:
|
|||||||
python -m pyaegis.benchmark
|
python -m pyaegis.benchmark
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Benchmarks of the Python module and the C library run on Intel i7-14700, linux, single core (the software is not multithreaded). Note that the results are in megabits per second, not bytes. The CPU lacks AVX-512 that makes the X4 variants faster on AMD hardware. The Python library performance is similar to that of the C library.
|
Benchmarks of the Python module and the C library run on Intel i7-14700, linux, single core (the software is not multithreaded). Note that the results are in megabits per second, not bytes. The CPU lacks AVX-512 that makes the X4 variants faster on AMD hardware.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<table>
|
|
||||||
<tr>
|
|
||||||
<td>
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
```bash
|
||||||
$ python -m pyaegis.benchmark
|
$ python -m pyaegis.benchmark
|
||||||
AEGIS-256 107666.56 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256 107666.56 Mb/s
|
||||||
@@ -257,8 +254,8 @@ AEGIS-256 MAC 110187.03 Mb/s
|
|||||||
AEGIS-256X2 MAC 210063.51 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256X2 MAC 210063.51 Mb/s
|
||||||
AEGIS-256X4 MAC 347406.96 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256X4 MAC 347406.96 Mb/s
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
</td>
|
|
||||||
<td>
|
The Python library performance is similar to that of the C library:
|
||||||
```bash
|
```bash
|
||||||
$ ./libaegis/zig-out/bin/benchmark
|
$ ./libaegis/zig-out/bin/benchmark
|
||||||
AEGIS-256 107820.86 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256 107820.86 Mb/s
|
||||||
@@ -274,6 +271,3 @@ AEGIS-256 MAC 116776.62 Mb/s
|
|||||||
AEGIS-256X2 MAC 224150.04 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256X2 MAC 224150.04 Mb/s
|
||||||
AEGIS-256X4 MAC 392088.05 Mb/s
|
AEGIS-256X4 MAC 392088.05 Mb/s
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
</td>
|
|
||||||
</tr>
|
|
||||||
</table>
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user